IN REGARD to spontaneous telepathy I may bring before the reader two cases which
I personally investigated, the percipient in the first case being a gentleman
who belonged to a circle which regularly met for the study of psychic phenomena,
and of which circle I was a member.
The percipient, Mr John Polley, gave me an account of his vision as follows:
"At a séance held within sound of Big Ben on 8th May 1901, there were present
Mrs E. V. M., Mr Thomas Atwood, and myself. As Mr Atwood resumed his seat after
delivering an address (about 8.30 p.m.) I became aware of a vision which
presented itself as being some five feet distant from me, and displayed part of
the interior of a room, namely, that part where the stove stood. The fire in the
stove was small and dull, and close beside it was an overturned chair. In front
of the fire was something that looked like a fire-guard or clothes-horse, but
this was not clear to me. Playing, or climbing over this article, was a child,
who fell forward, and when it regained its feet I noticed that its dress was on
fire. I made no reference to the matter at the time, as I had an impression that
the vision might be connected with some occurrence in the family of Mrs M., and
I was averse to mentioning it for fear of awakening sad memories. Shortly
afterwards the whole vision was repeated, and this time I had an uncontrollable
impulse to speak. Upon describing what I had seen for the second time, I was
much relieved to hear that the matter was not recognised as being connected in
any way with the sitters. I may mention here that the child appeared to be about
three years old, and, judging from the style of dress, I described it as a girl,
although the vision would apply equally to a boy, as at that early age the short
clothes worn by both sexes would be very similar.
"Next Thursday morning, 9th May 1901, upon awakening, I described to my wife the
events of the previous evening's séance. On the evening of the same day, namely,
Thursday, 9th May, I was out with a friend, and upon my return home at 11.05
p.m., my sister, Mary Louisa Polley, who resided with me at the time, made the
remark, 'I have a piece of bad news for you.' 'Well,' I replied, 'what is it?
Let me know.' And she answered, 'Brother George's little son, Jacky, has been
burned to death.' Like a flash I realised the connexion of the sad event with my
vision of the previous night. I then asked my sister, 'How did you know this,
and when?' She replied, 'Mr Fred Sinnett told me when he came over to see us
this evening.'
(Signed) "JOHN POLLEY"
I obtained from the other sitters at the séance the following statement:
"At the séance held on the evening of Wednesday, 8th May 1901, at which were
present Mrs E. V. M., Mr Thomas Atwood, and Mr John Polley, we, the undersigned,
testify that Mr John Polley gave to us a description of a vision of the burning
of a child which he saw at this séance.
(Signed in full) "E. V. M.
"THOMAS ATWOOD"
I personally interviewed Mr John Polley's wife and sister and received a written
statement from each confirming Mr Polley's account.
A local paper containing an account of the inquest on the child states that the
accident took place on Tuesday, 7th May, and the child was taken to a hospital
immediately and there died. The father of the child wrote to me as follows:
"DEAR SIR, - In reply to your inquiry respecting my late son, John Frederick, I
beg to say that on Tuesday, 7th May, my wife went out to do some shopping,
leaving my son, aged two years and two months, in a bedroom with another brother
aged seven. Whilst the elder brother was getting some toys to play with, the
deceased thrust some paper in the fire, pulled it out again, and set fire to his
clothes. Some neighbours took him to the Children's Hospital, Paddington Green,
where he passed away on Wednesday, 8th May, at 11.45 a.m. No intimation of this
was given by myself or any member of our family to my brother, Mr John Polley,
until a friend of the family called at my address on Thursday, 9th May, between
1 and 2 p.m., when we informed him of the sad loss that we had sustained, and
he told us that he intended calling on my brother that evening, and we asked
him if he would communicate the news to my brother and sister who reside at
Church Street, Stoke Newington. Of course, Sir, you know I am antagonistic to
your views, but my brother has told me it is for the interests of science. If
this is so, I take great pleasure in its furtherance. - Yours sincerely,
(Signed) "FREDERICK GEORGE POLLEY"
In the above case it appears to me that the vision of the burning child which Mr
John Polley saw arose out of a spontaneous telepathic impression, either from
the mind of the father of the child to his brother's (Mr John Polley's mind), or
from the mind of one of the persons who was cognisant of the sad event.
In regard to the second case of spontaneous telepathy to which I have referred,
I cannot do better than to give the account of same as it appeared in the
Journal of the Society for Psychical Research of June 1912:
"The following case of a reciprocal telepathic impression occurring to two
persons at the same Lime has been communicated to us by Mr W. W. Baggally. Both
Miss Emma Steele and Mr Claude Burgess, the lady and gentleman concerned in the
case, are known personally to Mr Baggally.
"Miss Steele writes as follows:
"'16 and 17 SILLWOOD PLACE,
"'BRIGHTON, 13th March 1912
"Mr Claude Burgess, who is an invalid, had been staying at my private hotel, at
the above address, for some months. He left on 15th February to take up his
residence at No. 10 Belgrave Place, Kemp Town, Brighton. In the interval between
the date of his leaving and the night of the 5th inst., when I had the
remarkable dream (if it can be called a dream) which I am about to relate, I had
not seen Mr Burgess, and nothing had occurred to cause me to think particularly
about him.
"'On the above night I retired to rest at my usual time. I awoke finding myself
standing in the middle of my room and answering, "All right, I'm coming," to Mr
Burgess, who, I thought, called three times Miss Steele! Miss Steele! Miss
Steele
"'By the time I had put on my dressing gown and lighted the gas I was fully
awake.
I then remembered Mr Burgess was no longer in the house. I looked at the clock
and noticed it was exactly 3 a.m. When I came downstairs next morning I told my
cook my dream, and remarked I hoped nothing had happened to Mr Burgess. During
the next day, Wednesday, 6th March, in the afternoon, a man called while I was
out and left a note from Mr Burgess, which I enclose. I was much surprised by
its contents. It struck me most forcibly getting it from him, as he is paralysed
and has to write with great difficulty with his left hand. He very seldom writes
now, so it must have made a great impression on him seeing me as he relates in his letter.
"'Emma M. Steele'
"The letter from Mr Burgess to Miss Steele referred to above, which is now in
our possession, was as follows
"'10 BETGRAVE PLACE, BRIGHTON
MY DEAR EMMA, - I had a funny dream about you last night. I dreamed that you
appeared at about 3 a.m. Just a glimpse of you. It's funny, isn't it? - Yours,
"'CLAUDE BURGESS'
"Miss Steele's cook made the following statement to Mr Baggally:
"'13th March 1912
"On Wednesday morning, the 6th March last, Miss Emma Steele came down from her
bedroom at 8.30. I saw she was looking pale. I asked her if she were not well.
She replied that she had had a strange dream. She heard Mr Burgess call her
three times. She told me that she suddenly jumped up and put her dressing-gown
on. By the time she had put on her dressing-gown and lit the gas she remembered
Mr Burgess had left the house. She said it was about 3 o'clock a.m. when she
heard Mr Burgess call.
(Signed) "'SARAH POLLARD
"The following statement was written by Mr Baggally on 13th March 1912, from Mr
Claude Burgess's dictation:
"'On Tuesday night, 5th March 1912, I woke up at about 3 a.m. with a start. I
saw Miss Emma Steele standing at the door of my bedroom. I had closed the door,
but she appeared to have opened it. She was attired in her ordinary dress.
"'I was much surprised. It was an absolutely distinct apparition. I had not been
thinking of her the previous day, and I cannot tell why she appeared to me.
"'The apparition lasted about five seconds. I was not at all frightened, and
went to sleep immediately after.
"'I was so struck by what I had seen that, next morning, the 6th March, at about
11 o'clock, I wrote a letter to Miss Steele which I handed to Mr William
Watkins, the proprietor of the establishment where I now reside, for him to send
to Miss Steele. In this letter I told Miss Steele that I had dreamed that she
had appeared to me on the previous night.
(Signed) "'CLAUDE BURGESS'
"In reply to Mr Baggally's personal inquiries, Mr Claude Burgess stated that it
was the first time that he had had a hallucination of this kind, and he had not
had one since.
Statement by Mr William Watkins
"'10 BELGRAVE PLACE,
BRIGHTON, 13th March 1912
Mr Claude Burgess delivered to me a letter which he had written to Miss Steele,
at about 11 a.m. on March, which I handed to a man of the Church Army Labour
Home to take to Miss Steele. The same morning at 8 a.m. Mr Burgess told me he
had dreamt of Miss Steele.
"'WILLIAM WATKINS'
Statement by Mr Baggally
"'I called on the afternoon of the 13th March 1912 at the offices of the Church
Army Labour Home, St James Street, Brighton, and saw the Secretary, who showed
me an entry in their books confirming the fact that, at the request of Mr
William Watkins, a man in their employ had delivered a letter to Miss Emma
Steele of 16 Sillwood Place, Brighton, in the afternoon of 6th March 1912.
"'I have interviewed all the persons connected with this case, and they
confirmed their respective statements.
"'W. W. BAGGALLY
"In reply to our further questions as to whether Mr Burgess's experience was a
dream or a waking hallucination, Mr Baggally wrote to us on 1st April 1912:
"'I had an interview with Mr Burgess today, and the following is the information
I received from him respecting the points you raise. He said to me:
"'"(1) I used the word 'dream' in my letter to Miss Steele for want of a better
word. (2) I woke up and then had the vision of Miss Steele. (3) I did not notice
anything in the room at the time I had the vision. The room appeared dark. (4)
Miss Steele appeared to me in a bright light, not self-luminous or
phosphorescent, but just as she would have appeared in daylight. She appeared to
me in the part of the room where the door was."'
"Mrs Baggally sends us the following statement enclosed in a letter dated 27th
April 1912:
"'I was in the drawing-room of Miss E. Steele's sister on the evening of
Wednesday, 6th March, when Miss Emma Steele came in, saying in an excited
manner, "Where is Mr Baggally? He will be so interested in this."
"'She held in her hand a letter from Mr Burgess, and proceeded to tell me that
the previous night she had heard, as she thought, Mr Burgess fall on the floor
of the bedroom over her own. She sprang out of bed.
"'Finding herself in the middle of the room, she heard him call "Miss Steele!"
three times. She then suddenly remembered that Mr Burgess was no longer living
in her hotel. She struck a light, looked at the clock, and found it was 3
o'clock. The following morning she felt so tired that when giving orders to her
cook, the latter noticed her fatigue and commented upon it. She told the cook
the reason was that she heard Mr Burgess apparently calling her at 3 o'clock.
"'Miss Steele proceeded to say that Mr Burgess had, curiously enough, sent her
that afternoon the note which at that moment she held in her hand, and in which
he told her that he dreamt she had appeared to him at 3 a.m. the previous night.
"'Miss Steele appeared much impressed and wondered if anything had happened to
Mr Burgess. I informed my husband that same night, on his return home, of what
Miss E. Steele had told me.
"'LAURA E. BAGGALLY’
"'On my return home on the evening of 6th March my wife related to me what
appears in her statement above.
"W. W. BAGGALLY'"
The above case is evidentially a good one, inasmuch as both Miss Emma Steele and
Mr Burgess each reported on the morning of 6th March (the one to her cook and
the other to his landlord) their experiences of the previous night before either
of them was aware that a reciprocal telepathic impression had occurred between
them.
Contents
> Next > Previous
|